Hi @Paulo-Mansano ,

Thanks for opening the PR!
It seems we slightly miscommunicated, since the intention is to 'modify' the existing transformations to construct ragged arrays as their metadata, not to create new transformations.

In specific we need to look at :

Where the metadata is allocated, (we want to modify it to allocate the ragged array)

and

Where the metadata frame is populated with information. (we want it to be in the form of a ragged array)

I hope this helps clarify things.

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 42.10526% with 55 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.94%. Comparing base (692dcc3) to head (137cf20).
⚠️ Report is 88 commits behind head on main.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2282      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.95%   72.94%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    46086    46103      +17     
============================================
  Files          1479     1480       +1     
  Lines        172654   172744      +90     
  Branches      33796    33817      +21     
============================================
+ Hits         125955   126007      +52     
- Misses        37201    37233      +32     
- Partials       9498     9504       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.